<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II</title>
        <link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/topic/627/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ This thread has been recreated from archive sources following the destructive attack on Ezboard at the end of May 2005This thread continues an earlier thread, now closed, but linked to here'The Flood Relief Scheme is not a failure' The Environment Agency is reported as saying in the local Observer newspaper of April 22nd 2005. Not much!! OK, so it stopped Windsor and Maidenhead being flooded in January 2003, but at what cost? By flooding the downstream reaches of the river! That was the cost!... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:20:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/1435/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-1435</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <em>Part of memorandum submitted by Professor Donald Knight (FL 85)</em>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Comments on the recent floods (Summer, 2007)</strong>
<br>
<br>
<br>
(vii) My last comment on the EA is one that possibly illustrates the lack of hydraulics knowledge. In my
<br>
last letter to Reg Purnell (27/07/05), I set out five issues that I thought were important concerning the new R&amp;D
<br>
arrangements. Regarding one issue I said &quot;As you are aware, I am still somewhat concerned about... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/1435</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/1432/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-1432</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We are grateful to Ewan Larcombe for the following:
<br>
<br>
________________________________
<br>
<br>
<br>
The Environment Agency appears to have attracted some criticism regarding lack of watercourse maintenance. The EFRA committee have now offered some
&#39;guidance&#39; as shown in the extract below:
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.jubileeriver.co.uk/080507%20-%20extract_from_report__house_of_c.htm">Extracts of the Report on Jubilee River.co.uk</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/1432</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/1174/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-1174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Please see below comments sent to Cabinet Office regarding the above report:
<br>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><br>
17th March 2008</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify; mso-layout-grid-align: none"></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><span lang="EN-GB" style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Dear
Sirs</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gillie Bolton)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/1174</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/685/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-685</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 23rd July 2007<br><br>We have received the following from Ewan Larcombe of Datchet who has posted here on a number of previous occasions with many insightful contributions. He writes:<br><br>__________________<br><br>Sir<br><br>I have always said 'don't worry about what the Government tell you or even about want they do not tell you, but you should worry about what they dare not tell you.'<br><br>In practice the Environment Agency has abandoned watercourse maintenance thus exacerbating the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/685</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/684/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>RBWM Press Release 15/05/2007</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><br>How much householders and businesses can find out about the flood risk to their homes, shops, offices and factories will be the key focus of the next meeting of Thames Flood Forum, to be held in Addlestone on Tuesday 22 May.<br><br>Forum members will look at:<br><br>How to find out whether specific homes or businesses are likely to flood<br>How to get reliable flood warnings to homes and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/684</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 01:26:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/683/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 5th March 2007<br><br>Dear Sir<br><br>'Effective consultation is a key part of the policy-making process.'  So says Tony Blair.  It is just a shame that his words are not put into practice by his minions, because according to recent reports, the Government have apparently failed to consult properly in the matter of Nuclear Power and will have to repeat the process.<br><br>It seems to me that the authorities find it both convenient and beneficial to exploit the premeditated misuse of the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/683</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/682/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Borough has announced an initiative entitled 'Working to Reduce the Dangers, Losses &amp; Misery of Flooding'. The text of the press release is included here: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://p088.ezboard.com/ftheroyalwindsorforumfrm10.showMessage?topicID=291.topic">Press release text included in 'Windsor Now' Forum area</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/682</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/681/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 9th  February 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Blackwhite</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>George Orwell (of 1984 fame) would have been very impressed.  The Environment Agency's blackwhite propaganda department has been working 24/7 recently.<br><br>Now commonly referred to as 'the bl'iters', these people have kept themselves occupied over recent years by adopting watercourses, amending flood maps and producing flood risk assessments for development purposes. Their... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/681</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/680/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-680</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Investment in flood defences should rise substantially to keep up with climate change is the message that the Environment Agency Board will hear and discuss when they meet in Bristol on Wednesday 7 February. <br><br>&quot;The new international scientific assessment leaves no reason for doubt or fudging about climate change - its real and happening now,&quot; Chairman of the Environment Agency, Sir John Harman said.<br><br>&quot;We need to invest more in adapting to climate change and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/680</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/679/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-679</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>The following has been notified to us by Ewan Larcombe and also features on </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.jubileeriver.co.uk/">www.jubileeriver.co.uk/</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br>_________________<br><br>More needs to be spent, on a 20-year investment programme of flood defences building, to keep up with climate change, according to Environment Agency (EA) chair Sir John Harman in an address to the EA board in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/679</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 03:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/678/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-678</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 4th February 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Thames Region CFMP</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Anybody living or working on floodplain in the Thames catchment upstream of Teddington needs to know that the Environment Agency has issued a consultation document 'Managing Flood Risk - Thames Region Catchment Flood Management Plan'.<br><br>In their summary document the EA claim 'We maintain the channels to ensure they are free of obstruction and can accommodate high... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/678</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 03:50:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/677/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-677</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 1st February 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br>Following on from Mr Wanamaker's letter in the press recently, where he comments on the EA's notification of the risk of flooding from 'THE SEA' to a householder living in Maidenhead Road Windsor.  Having considered the implications of an EA predicted tsunami reaching Windsor, there are in fact serious issues here as another householder residing in Datchet has received the same risk assessment from the EA regarding his property.<br><br>Insurance companies... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/677</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/676/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-676</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 31st January 2007<br><br>Dear Thamesweb<br><br>Many thanks for your comments dated 28th January 2007.<br><br>I agree with you that areas of Maidenhead Road were flooded in 1947 - and some of the houses - although as far as I know the one in question did not.<br><br>My point is that the house is well above the river level at the nearest locks - which are over 18 metres above mean sea level at Newlyn - I do not dispute in any way the 1:100 flood risk assessment from the river - that's about... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/676</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/675/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-675</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 30th January 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br>Have you noticed the similarities between the Home Office and the Environment Agency?  To his credit, Home Office Minister John Reid has publicly confessed that his department is 'not fit for purpose'. Unfortunately he was the very last person to admit to failings that have been blatantly obvious for decades to anybody not in the Cabinet.  Surely a fundamentally flawed culture where the employees are rewarded with jobs-for-life and inflation proof pensions... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/675</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/674/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It is always a pleasure to read the latest letters form Messrs Larcombe and Wanamaker and their informed opinions on the subject of the Jubilee River and its effects on river levels downstream. I must however take issue with one small claim.<br><br>Mr Wanakmaker states that Maidenhead Road is well above river level and hence flood level.  Sadly 1947 proved otherwise. Much of Maidenhead Road was submerged, especially at the eastern end, during that catastrophe.  Indeed the flood waters were to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/674</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/673/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-673</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 26th January 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br>In the true spirit of a government quango - deny everything, do nothing, and &quot;spin&quot;!  The Environment Agency continues to blind us with their incompetence.<br><br>The Environment Agency, not content with just building a 110 flawed flood relief scheme, cutting both costs and corners, which then resulted in the flooding of downstream areas, like Wraysbury, Datchet and Old Windsor. These areas would otherwise not have been flooded, as few houses... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/673</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/669/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 14th January 2007<br><br>Sir<br><br>With much current debate on climate change, my book (The Rise and Fall of the Jubilee River) has now developed into a film script. With the not very original working title of 'Carry on Flooding' this entirely fictitious but educational scenario will portray the justification, design, construction, operation and associated consequences of a multi-million pound flood alleviation scheme that proved to be sub-standard and resulted in a significant out-of-court... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/669</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/668/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 29th December 2006<br><br>Sir<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>New Year Greetings to my Environment Agency friends</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Another year has passed and it is time for me to offer the compliments of the season to my many friends at the Environment Agency.<br><br>It is now four years since thousands of people downstream of Windsor were affected by serious Thames flooding for the first time since 1947.  Naturally the EA issued robust denials that the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/668</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/667/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 24December 2006<br><br>Sir<br><br>Jubilee River Operating Procedure to be Examined<br><br>Predictably Environment Agency employees who have vigorously defended their Jubilee River Operating Procedure since the disastrous flooding downstream of Windsor in January 2003 appear to have had a dramatic change of opinion. A recent EA announcement at the Thames Flood Forum meeting (chaired by retired scientist Tom Crossett) revealed that the engineering firm WS Atkins have been contracted to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/667</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/reply/666/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html#reply-666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sir<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Four More Months of Winter and Four years Since the Flooding</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>In January 2003, many thousands of people near the Thames downstream of Windsor were affected by flooding for the first time in over fifty years.  It is now blatantly obvious why the Minister responsible at the time (Elliot Morley MP) refused to hold a Public Inquiry into the role of the Environment Agency and their Jubilee River flood... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Unregistered(d))</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/sreply/666</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Flood Relief Channel - Jubilee River - Part II ]]></title>
			<link>http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/topic/627/t/The-Flood-Relief-Channel-Jubilee-River-Part-II.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This thread has been recreated from archive sources following the destructive attack on Ezboard at the end of May 2005<br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://p088.ezboard.com/ftheroyalwindsorforumfrm9.showMessage?topicID=4.topic">This thread continues an earlier thread, now closed, but linked to here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>'The Flood Relief Scheme is not a failure' The Environment Agency is reported as saying in the local Observer newspaper of April 22nd 2005.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thamesweb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://theroyalwindsorforum.yuku.com/topic/627</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>